Jesu li otporniji ujedno i sretniji? Konstrukcija novog Upitnika otpornosti

• Post by: Psyche General
• 27.09.2021.
• Comments off

Sažetak

U ovom je radu konstrukt otpornosti definiran kao dinamičan proces oporavka nakon životnih nedaća koji uključuje sposobnost prilagodbe, ustrajnost i efikasne strategije nošenja s problemima. Cilj je ovog rada konstruirati Upitnik otpornosti s obzirom na danu definiciju, ispitati faktorsku strukturu upitnika te provjeriti njegove metrijske karakteristike. Konačna obrada provedena je na 412 odraslih (71.8% žena i 28.2% muškaraca). Statističkom analizom pokazano je da se konačne 23 čestice Upitnika otpornosti grupira u 6 faktora: percipirana samoefikasnost, duhovnost, suočavanje sa stresom, bliski odnosi, upornost te sposobnost brzog oporavka koji objašnjavaju 55.62% ukupne varijance. Zadovoljena je unutarnja konzistentnost na svim faktorima. Konvergentna valjanost (ispitivana povezanošću s već postojećim indikatorom otpornosti), divergentna valjanost (ispitivana povezanošću s indikatorom emocionalne kompetentnosti ) i kriterijska valjanost (ispitivana s Upitnikom subjektivne sreće) pokazale su se zadovoljavajućima. Provjerom inkrementalne valjanosti pokazano je da novokreirani Upitnik otpornosti dodatno objašnjava 0.1% varijance kriterija subjektivne sreće.

Ključne riječi: konstrukcija upitnika, emocionalna kompetentnost, oporavak, otpornost, subjektivna sreća

Abstract

In this paper, the construct of resilience is defined as a dynamic process of recovery after life adversities. Resilienceincludes adaptability, perseverance, and effective coping strategies. The aim of this paper is to construct the Resilience Questionnaire, to examine the factor structure, and to check its metric characteristics. The study involved 412 participants (71.8% female and 28.2% male). Statistical analaysis showed that the final 27 items of the Resilience Questionnaire are grouped into 6 factors: Perceived Self-Efficiency, Spirituality, Coping with Stress, Close Relationships, Persistence, and Ability to Recover Rapidly, which explain 55.62% of the total variance. The internal consistency of all the factors of the questionnaire is sufficient. Convergent validity (tested via indicator of resilience), divergent validity (tested via indicator of emotional competency) and criterion validity (tested via Subjective Happiness Questionnaire) proved to be satisfactory. Incremental validation showed that Resilience istance Questionnaire further explains 0.1% of the variance of the subjective happiness criteria.

Keywords: questionnaire construction, resilience, revival, emotional competence, validation, subjective wellbeing